Duke v. Bolster, 211 P. 715 (Wash. 1923). · Go Syfert
Search
Duke v. Bolster, 211 P. 715 (Wash. 1923). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
John P. Duke, as Supervisor of Banking, etc.
v.
Harry Bolster
No. 17260.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jan 12, 1923.
211 P. 715
1923 Wash. LEXIS 687
Gordon & Nolte and Richards, Fontaine & Gilbert, for appellants.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The issues in this case are the same as those in Duke v. Johnson, ante p. 43, 211 Pac. 710, the two cases being presented on the same briefs and arguments. In the Johnson case we decided that the action was properly brought by J. P. Duke, as supervisor of banking, and sustained a judgment in his favor.

Upon the authority of .the Johnson case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment in this case is affirmed.