McAdams v. Armored Car Serv. of Florida, 139 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). · Go Syfert
Search
McAdams v. Armored Car Serv. of Florida, 139 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George McADAMS
v.
ARMORED CAR SERVICE OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, and Wesley Carl Knight, Home Indemnity Company and Tri-City Septic Tank Company
No. 61-459.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 3, 1962.
139 So. 2d 435
1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3481
Dean, Adams, Fischer and Gautier, Miami, for appellant., Wakefield and Underwood and Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay and Kimbrell, Miami, for appellees.
Carroll, Dry, Hen, Pearson, Tillman.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the same order which was the subject of the appeal in Case No. 61-435, Workmen’s Compensation Lienor, Home Indemnity Company, as carrier, and Tri-City Septic Tank Company, as employer v. McAdams, Armored Car Service of Florida and Wesley Carl Knight, Fla.App., 139 So.2d 433. The order appealed allotted to the workmen’s compensation lienor an amount pursuant to subsection 3 of § 440.39, Fla.Stat.,F.S.A. as that section existed prior to amendment in 1959. The employee-plaintiff, being dissatisfied with the amount awarded the workmen’s compensation lienor, has prosecuted this appeal.

The employee contends that having correctly decided that the insurance carrier could not recover under subsection 4 of § 440.39, Fla.Stat.,F.S.A., the trial judge then incorrectly determined that the carrier had rights under subsection 3. In appeal No. 61-435 we held that the trial judge correctly found that subsection 3 was applicable; thereby affirmance of the same order is required upon this appeal.

Affirmed.