State ex rel. Robinson v. State, 176 So. 3d 1029 (La. 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
State ex rel. Robinson v. State, 176 So. 3d 1029 (La. 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State Board of Ethics v. Saunders (lactapp, 2015-12-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State Board of Ethics v. Saunders
La. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State Board of Ethics v. Garriga, 15-1800 (La.10/9/15), 178 So.3d 994 , and State Board of Ethics v. Arnold, 15-1795 (La.10/9/15), 176 So.3d 1029 . 3 Based on the evidence submitted, Ms. Saunders’ certification that she did “not owe any outstanding late fines, fees, or penalties pursuant to the Code of Governmental Ethics” was false.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE ex rel. Sterling Germaine ROBINSON
v.
STATE of Louisiana
No. 2014-KH-2601.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 9, 2015.
176 So. 3d 1029
2015 La. LEXIS 2148
2015 WL 5919925
Published
PER curiam:

| denied. Moot. The trial court denied relator’s claims after conducting an eviden-tiary hearing on July 31, 2014.

Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C.- § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing, of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator’s claims have now been fully litigated in state collateral proceedings in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless relator can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review.