G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2018–2019 ·
…the bank offered some evidence, albeit insufficient, to prove the amount of indebtedness . . . the bank is entitled to further proceedings on remand to determine the amount of the indebtedness
⚠ not in text
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
ISAIAH L. SPENCER & SHATIKA L. SPENCER v. DITECH FINANCIAL, L L C
Paeth v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 220 So. 3d 1273, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (emphasis in original) (holding that plaintiff was entitled to a new trial on the amount of indebtedness where it introduced some evidence of the amount, but the evidence was legally insufficient); see also Evans v. HSBC Bank, USA, Nat'l Ass'n, 223 So. 3d 1059, 1063-64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (characterizing amount of indebtedness as "damages" and remanding for new trial where plaintiff presented "some" evidence of indebtedness, but the evidence was not admissible).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marvin SCOTT
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
CASE NO. 1D17-2257.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 23, 2017.
Marvin Scott, pro se, Petitioner., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Bilbrey, Lewis, Roberts.
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED as successive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C).
ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and ' BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.