G Cite
cited 6× by 6 distinct cases, 2005–2025 · 2 courts ·
…preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within a reasonable time.
at p. 1101
⚠ not in text
cited 5× by 5 distinct cases, 2005–2025 · 2 courts ·
…judgment, skill, care and diligence that a reasonable or prudent person would ordinarily exercise in the management of his or her own affairs.
at p. 1101
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: First & Partial Acct. of G.L. Hempt Trustee
However, we have also acknowledged that “the respective fiduciary capacities of executor and trustee are legally distinct[.]” Matter of Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1103 (Pa.Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: D.S.B., Appeal of: Est. of D.S.B.
An administrator of an estate has the duty to take custody of the Estate and to “preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within a reasonable time.” Matter of Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Est. of E.S.H., Appeal of: K. Hatcher
A personal representative bears the responsibility to “preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within a reasonable time.” In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Estate of Frey, M., Jr.
"An executor's duty is to take custody of the estate and to administer it so as to preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within areasonable time." Matter ofEstate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
MCCARTHY & COMPANY, P.C. v. STEINBERG
Counts 1 and 2 Against Defendant as Executor “An executor’s duty is to take custody of the estate and to administer it so as to preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within a reasonable time.” In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Estate of: Nancy Stapler-Elias, etc.
In the performance of her fiduciary duties, the fiduciary must exercise the "judgment, skill, care and diligence that a reasonable or prudent person would ordinarily exercise in the management of his or her own affairs." In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101-02 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Kline, C.
In the performance of his fiduciary duties, the fiduciary must exercise the “judgment, skill, care and diligence that a reasonable or prudent person would ordinarily exercise in the management of his or her own affairs.” In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101-02 (Pa. Super. 1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Fulare, L. Appeal of: Fulare, J.
Accordingly, as did the orphans’ court, we address Appellants’ issues concurrently. -6- J-A03023-19 Matter of Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1104 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Estate of Ford, L. Appeal of: Miller, A.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa.Super. 1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Estate of Riddle, L.
Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1104 (Pa. Super. 1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Estate of Riddle, L.
Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1104 (Pa. Super. 1997).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Est. of Riddle, L. Appeal of Riddle, K.
Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1104 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Estate of Devoe, R.
In other words, the executor bears the responsibility to “preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within a reasonable time.” In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: Estate of Mehall Appeal of: Wesolowsky, M.
In the discharge of this duty, an executor is regarded as a fiduciary and is held to the highest degree of good faith. -4- J-S44037-15 In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101-02 (Pa. Super. 1997) (citations and quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Luellen v. Luellen
In other words, the executrix bears the responsibility to “preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within a reasonable time.” In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa.Super.Ct.1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Padezanin
In other words, the executor bears the responsibility to “preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within a reasonable time.” In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa.Super.1997).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Estate of Westin
In other words, the executor bears the responsibility to “preserve and protect the property for distribution to the proper persons within a reasonable time.” In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101 (Pa.Super.1997).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Trust Under Agreement of Ware
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Cf. In Re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1102 (Pa.Super.1997) (holding that a trustee is charged with the duty of receiving trust property, administering it and ensur *733 ing the safety of trust principal).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Est. of G.S., Appeal of: Stewart, A.
(2×)
See In re Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1101-02 (Pa. Super. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin, C. v. Paul, S. and Martin, C.
Furthermore, a trustee must “take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.” 20 Pa.C.S. § 7779; see also In the Matter of Estate of Campbell, 692 A.2d 1098, 1102 (Pa. Super. 1997) (trustee has duty of “receiv[ing] trust property and administer[ing] it”) (citation omitted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Sherman T. CRAVER
v.
Sherman T. CRAVER
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 23, 1997.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 1997, it is ordered that the warrant of execution scheduled for the week of June 1, 1997 is stayed pending the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari or a petition to extend the time thereof with the United States Supreme Court. Upon the timely filing with the United States Supreme Court, the execution shall be stayed pending action by the United States Supreme Court on the petition for certiorari from this Court’s ruling in Commonwealth v. Craver, — Pa. -, 688 A.2d 691 (1997).
This stay is automatically dissolved by the failure to file the aforesaid petitions by June 6,1997.