In re Howes, 45 A.3d 160 (D.C. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Howes, 45 A.3d 160 (D.C. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Krijger (conn, 2014-09-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Krijger
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re S.W., supra, 45 A.3d 160 (‘‘[A listener’s] subjective response, although entirely under- standable, does not change the objective calculus as to whether [the defendant] posed a threat . . . . [I]t can be expected [under certain circumstances] that [the listener’s] sensitivities would be heightened.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re G. Paul HOWES
No. 10-BG-938.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Jun 7, 2012.
45 A.3d 160
2012 WL 2044971
Blackburne, Pryor, Reid, Rigsby.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (1)

[*161] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of respondent’s motion to reset the effective date of disbarment, and Bar Counsel’s response thereto, it is

ORDERED that respondent’s motion is granted and the effective date of respondent’s disbarment is nunc pro tunc to September 80, 2010. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that an amended opinion shall issue on the date of this order.