Alston v. Christiana Hosp., 148 A.3d 1171 (Del. 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Alston v. Christiana Hosp., 148 A.3d 1171 (Del. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case · …because the anti-reliance provision does not contain this type of unambiguous anti-reliance disclaimer by buyer, those provisions are not sufficient to preclude its common law fraud claim relating to the pre-merger materials. ⚠ not in text
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: ORIGIN, INC. v. MAGID FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. (njd, 2023-05-31)
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) ORIGIN, INC. v. MAGID FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
D.N.J. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
delaware law enforces clauses which identify the specific information on which a party has relied and foreclose reliance on other information.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Partners & Simons, Inc. v. Sandbox Acquisitions, LLC
Del. Ch. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because the anti-reliance provision does not contain this type of unambiguous anti-reliance disclaimer by buyer, those provisions are not sufficient to preclude its common law fraud claim relating to the pre-merger materials.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas D. ALSTON, Below
v.
CHRISTIANA HOSPITAL, Below
No. 158, 2016.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Sep 30, 2016.
148 A.3d 1171
2016 Del. LEXIS 510
2016 WL 5757049
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: #43,743 of 633,719
Citer courts: Court of Chancery of Delaware (1) · D. New Jersey (1)

Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. N16C-03-028

AFFIRMED.