Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, Warden, Metro. Corr. Ctr. San Diego, California, United States of Am. v. Raul Chavez-Sanchez, 871 F.2d 104 (9th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, Warden, Metro. Corr. Ctr. San Diego, California, United States of Am. v. Raul Chavez-Sanchez, 871 F.2d 104 (9th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 4 distinct cases, 2021–2025 · …oregon's two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions applies to actions under 42 u.s.c. 1983 . at p. 105 ⚠ not in text
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2001 · 2 courts · …when papers are mailed to the clerk's office, filing is complete when the papers are received by the clerk. at p. 105 ⚠ not in text
27 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Crawford-Mulley v. CORNING INC. (nywd, 1999-12-21) · Strongest negative: United States v. Joel Seminole (ca9, 1989-08-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" United States v. Joel Seminole
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 871 F.2d 104 (9th Cir.1989) (per curiam) (hereinafter Gubiensio II) (overruling Gubiensio I).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Crawford-Mulley v. CORNING INC.
W.D.N.Y. · 1999 · confidence medium
See, e.g., U.S. v. White, 980 F.2d 836, 845 (2d Cir.1992) (holding that filing requires delivery of papers into the actual custody of the clerk); U.S. v. 1979 Cadillac Sedan Deville, 793 F.Supp. 492, 493-494 (D.Vt.1992) (holding that filing “carries the meaning not of sending papers, but of delivery into the actual custody’ of the clerk) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Ortiz v. County of Orange, 152 F.3d 928 (9th Cir.1998); Haney v. Mizell Memorial Hospital, 744 F.2d 1467, 1472 (11th Cir.1984) (notice of appeal is deemed filed when it is received by clerk, and that “simply d…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nearhood v. Tops Markets, Inc.
W.D.N.Y. · 1999 · confidence medium
See, e.g., U.S. v. White, 980 F.2d 836, 845 (2d Cir.1992) (holding that filing requires delivery of papers into the actual custody of the clerk); U.S. v. 1979 Cadillac Sedan Deville, 793 F.Supp. 492, 493-494 (D.Vt.1992) (holding that filing “carries the meaning not of sending papers, but of delivery into the actual custody” of the clerk) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Ortiz v. County of Orange, 152 F.3d 928 (9th Cir.1998); Haney v. Mizell Memorial Hospital, 744 *306 F.2d 1467, 1472 (11th Cir.1984) (notice of appeal is deemed filed when it is received by clerk, and that “sim…
cited Cited "see" Strickland v. Wayne Farms-Southland Hatchery
M.D. Ala. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cooper, supra; Clark, supra. Similarly, Plaintiff provides absolutely no evidence to support her contention that the Clerk of Court processed Plaintiffs Complaint in an inefficient manner.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jesus Rodriguez-Lopez
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 871 F.2d 104 (9th Cir.1989).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Terry James Kohl
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 857 F.2d 1245 (9th Cir.1988), vacated and remanded sub. nom., 488 U.S. 1036 , 109 S.Ct. 859 , 102 L.Ed.2d 984 (1989), after remand, 871 F.2d 104 (9th Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Hector Martin Ramos
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. ("The amended rule sets forth only the minimum advice that must be provided to the defendant by the court.”). 23 .Ramos pled guilty in January 1989 and was sentenced in April 1989.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Linda Wright
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Chavez-Sanchez, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 859 , 102 L.Ed.2d 984 (1989), on remand Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 871 F.2d 104 (9th Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz
v.
Al Kanahele, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center San Diego, California, United States of America v. Raul Chavez-Sanchez
88-5848.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 31, 1989.
871 F.2d 104
1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4169
Published

871 F.2d 104

Jose GUBIENSIO-ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Al KANAHELE, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center San
Diego, California, Respondent-Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Raul CHAVEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 88-5848, 88-5109.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 2, 1989.
Decided March 31, 1989.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~104–105]1

On August 23, 1988, we held the Sentencing Guidelines, challenged in these cases, to be unconstitutional (Wiggins, dissenting). On January 23, 1989, the Supreme Court simultaneously granted a petition for writ of certiorari and vacated the judgment, remanding to this court for further consideration in light of Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1988). United States v. Chavez-Sanchez, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 859, 102 L.Ed.2d 984 (1989) vacating Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 857 F.2d 1245 (1988). In Mistretta, the Supreme Court upheld the Sentencing Guidelines against the same Constitutional challenges that we considered in the instant case.

2

Upon reconsideration in light of Mistretta, we affirm Gubiensio-Ortiz v. United States, No. 88-5848. In United States v. Chavez-Sanchez, 88-5109, we reverse and remand for resentencing under the guidelines.