Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Delene Ann Gilkerson v. Charles Randall Gilkerson
See Putnam v. Fanning, 495 S.W.2d 175 (Ky. 1973); accord Goldman v. Eichenholz, 851 S.W.2d 463, 465 (Ky. 1993). -16- distribution” of property pursuant to KRS 403.190 – specifically, about 40% of the marital assets, as opposed to 25% to 33%.3 In its exhaustive order to that effect, entered August 30, 2021, the circuit court reviewed the parties’ evidence and made the following relevant findings of fact and conclusions of law: FINDINGS OF FACT ... 11.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tracie Massie v. Darrell Massie
It also has a bearing on 1 See Putnam v. Fanning, 495 S.W.2d 175 (Ky. 1973); accord Goldman v. Eichenholz, 851 S.W.2d 463, 465 (Ky. 1993). -2- whether we employ the recognized standard of review, or in the case of an unpreserved error, whether palpable error review is being requested and may be granted.” Oakley v. Oakley, 391 S.W.3d 377, 380 (Ky. App. 2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, CLE COMMISSION, Movant
v.
Julia Caldwell MORRIS
v.
Julia Caldwell MORRIS
No. 92-SC-1044-KB.
Kentucky Supreme Court.
Feb 18, 1993.
Stephens.
Published
ORDER
Pursuant to SCR 3.669, this Court finds that Julia Caldwell Morris, respondent, has not shown cause for her failure to comply with the minimum continuing legal education requirements of SCR 3.661.
Respondent is hereby notified of her proposed suspension from the practice of law twenty (20) days from the date of this order, pursuant to SCR 3.668(2), unless before that date she complies with the requirements of SCR 3.667(2), including her application for extension of time and payment of the filing fee.
Upon failure to timely comply with the terms of this order, respondent, Julia Caldwell Morris, is suspended from the practice of law pursuant to SCR 3.668(2).
Entered: February 18, 1993.
/s/ Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice