Paragon Grp., Inc. v. Putnam, 883 S.W.2d 573 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Paragon Grp., Inc. v. Putnam, 883 S.W.2d 573 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 1995–2017 · 2 courts · …a ministerial function involves clerical duties which a public officer is required to perform upon a given state of facts, in a prescribed manner, in compliance of legal authority, without regard to the public officer's own judgment or opinion on the appropriateness of the act. at p. 576 ⚠ not in text
15 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vicki Shad-Schaefer, Individually, and Vicki Shade-Schaefer on Behalf of the Estate of Wayne Schaefer, Christopher Schaefer, and Stephanie Schaefer v. City of Eureka, Robert Wade, and Richard Green
Mo. Ct. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
But liability may still be imposed on public officers performing ministerial functions. 3 As a result, we need not address the public duty doctrine issue. 8 Clay v. Scott, 883 S.W.2d 573, 576 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Riggs v. Gibbs (2×)
W.D. Mo. · 2017 · confidence medium
Clay v. Scott, 883 S.W.2d 573, 576 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Boever v. Special School District of Saint Louis County
Mo. Ct. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
Id.; Clay v. Scott, 883 S.W.2d 573, 575-76 (Mo.App.1994); Scher v. Purkett, 847 S.W.2d 76, 78 (Mo.App.1992); Norton v. Smith, 782 S.W.2d 775, 777 (Mo.App.1989).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Harris v. Munoz
Mo. Ct. App. · 2001 · confidence medium
Charron v. Thompson, 939 S.W.2d 885, 886 (Mo. banc 1996); Clay v. Scott, 883 S.W.2d 573, 576 (Mo.App.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Warren v. State
Mo. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
Id. at 576 (emphasis added).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Barry Service Agency Co. v. Manning
Mo. Ct. App. · 1995 · confidence medium
Furthermore, as our courts have stated in the official immunity context, “a ministerial function involves clerical duties which a public officer is required to perform upon a given state of facts, in a prescribed manner, in compliance of legal authority, without regard to the public officer’s own judgment or opinion on the appropriateness of the act.” Clay v. Scott, 883 S.W.2d 573, 576 (Mo.App.1994) (emphasis added).
discussed Cited "see" Waters v. State
Tex. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grigsby v. State, 883 S.W.2d 573 , 573-76 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1992, pet. ref'd); Parker v. State, No. 08-03-00172-CR, 2004 WL 2113050 , at *11 (Tex.App.-El Paso Sept. 23, 2004, no pet.) (not designated for publication).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Brown v. Tate
Mo. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Clay v. Scott, 883 S.W.2d 573 (Mo.App.E.D.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PARAGON GROUP, INC.
v.
Linda PUTNAM, d/b/a Linda's Diamond House, Defendant/Third-Party v. BURNS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC., Third-Party Defendant/Respondent
No. 65585.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Sep 16, 1994.
883 S.W.2d 573
Raymond Howard, Howard Law Firm, St. Louis, for appellant., Edward S. Meyer, Stephen E. Winbom, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent Burns Intern. ■ Security Services, Inc.
Crandall, Crane, Crist.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Linda Putnam, brought what is denominated as a third-party action against Burns International Security Services, Inc. Defendant appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Burns following the dismissal of the underlying action.

No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).