State v. Kennedy, 883 S.W.2d 579 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Kennedy, 883 S.W.2d 579 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
v.
Timothy KENNEDY, Defendant/Appellant Timothy KENNEDY, Movant/Appellant v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Nos. 63180, 63969 and 65237.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Sep 27, 1994.
883 S.W.2d 579
1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1518
1994 WL 521607
Matthew J. O’Connor, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant., Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Crahan, Gaertner, Reinhard.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.-211.2, RSMo Supp.1991. He was sentenced by the court as a class X offender to a term of six years’ imprisonment. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).