No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maurice GRIFFIN
v.
STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
v.
STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
No. 66484.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Mar 21, 1995.
David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant., Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Crahan, Grimm, Reinhard.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.Movant appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly[*672] erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).