Elliott v. State, 908 S.W.2d 187 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Elliott v. State, 908 S.W.2d 187 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rico ELLIOTT, Movant/Appellant
v.
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
No. 67155.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Oct 24, 1995.
908 S.W.2d 187
1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1754
1995 WL 619844
Susan K. Eckles, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant., Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Karohl, Reinhard, White.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).