green
Positive treatment
11.9 score
Cited for
At page 619 Tex. App.--San Antonio 2009, no pet.1 citing case
- Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, & JDMI, LLC, No. 06-14-00100-CV (Tex. App.—Texarkana Aug. 31, 2015).(Tex. App.--San Antonio 2009, no pet.)
At page 626 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d1 citing case
- Ruben Lee Allen v. State, No. 01-16-00768-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 28, 2017).(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Erwin KOURIK, Petitioner/Respondent
v.
Donna J. KOURIK (n/k/a \Bell\")"
v.
Donna J. KOURIK (n/k/a \Bell\")"
No. 75187.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jun 8, 1999.
William M. Spieler, St. Louis, for appellant., Bruce F. Hilton, Lawrence G. Gillespie, Hilton, Gillespie & Kiesewetter, L.L.C., Kirkwood, for respondent.
Gaertner, Hoff, Russell.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.Mother appeals the trial court’s judgment of modification of her dissolution with respect to the transfer of custody of her minor children. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and[*614] does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).