Burton v. State, 389 S.W.3d 747 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Burton v. State, 389 S.W.3d 747 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Christopher BURTON, Movant
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
No. ED 98374.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jan 22, 2013.
389 S.W.3d 747
2013 WL 216366
2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 75
Jessica M. Hathaway, Loyce A. Hamilton, Office of the Mo. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant., Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Amburg, Crane, Hoff.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Christopher Burton, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).