S.G.L. ex rel. B.L. v. M.A.W., 390 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
S.G.L. ex rel. B.L. v. M.A.W., 390 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
S.G.L., by next friend, B.L.
v.
M.A.W.
No. ED 97845.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jan 29, 2013.
390 S.W.3d 262
2013 WL 326957
2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 93
Bruce F. Hilton, Kirkwood, MO, for Appellant., John E. Tresslar, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Dowd, Quigless, Richter.
Published

[*263] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M.W. (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying her motion to modify custody and child support. Mother argues the trial court erred in (1) denying her motion to modify because a change in circumstances had occurred and modification of custody and child support was in the best interests of S.G.L. (“Child”), and (2) failing to make findings pursuant to Section 452.875.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).