Gillispie v. State, 414 S.W.3d 52 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Gillispie v. State, 414 S.W.3d 52 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Artoska GILLISPIE
v.
STATE of Missouri
No. ED 99882.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Nov 19, 2013.
414 S.W.3d 52
2013 WL 6095550
2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1377
Amy Faerber, St. Louis, MO, for appellant., Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Artoska Gillispie appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).