Kenneth Abrams v. Commc'ns Workers of Am., an Unincorporated Labor Org., 884 F.2d 628 (D.C. Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Kenneth Abrams v. Commc'ns Workers of Am., an Unincorporated Labor Org., 884 F.2d 628 (D.C. Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ellsworth Associates, Inc. v. United States (dcd, 1996-02-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ellsworth Associates, Inc. v. United States
D.D.C. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, 702 F.Supp. 920, 925 (D.D.C.1988) (denying motion for injunction pending appeal where motion merely reasserted grounds for relief which were previously rejected), aff'd, 884 F.2d 628 (D.C.Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 540 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
cited Cited "see" Abrams v. Communications Workers of America
D.D.C. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, 884 F.2d 628 (D.C.Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth Abrams
v.
Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Labor Organization
88-7234.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jul 13, 1989.
884 F.2d 628
1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10122
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Unpublished

884 F.2d 628

143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2304, 280 U.S.App.D.C. 189

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Kenneth ABRAMS, et al., Appellants,
v.
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, An Unincorporated Labor
Organization.

No. 88-7234.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 13, 1989.

Before MIKVA, HARRY T. EDWARDS and RUTH B. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This case was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders, filed October 25, 1988 and November 7, 1988, be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memoranda accompanying those orders.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.