Adams v. McPherson, 34 P. 1095 (Idaho 1893). · Go Syfert
Adams v. McPherson, 34 P. 1095 (Idaho 1893). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Petty v. Petty (idaho, 1950-09-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1906 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1906 1966 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Petty v. Petty
Idaho · 1950 · confidence medium
In Cantwell v. McPherson, 3 Idaho 721 at 726 , 34 P. 1095 at 1097, this court stated: “The purchaser of real estate at sheriff’s sale is not entitled to possession thereof until the time -for redemption has expired, and a sheriff’s deed executed therefor.” See also, Eastern *478 Idaho Loan & Trust Co. v. Blomberg, 62 Idaho 497 , 113 P.2d 406 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ADAMS
v.
McPHERSON, Administrator
Idaho Supreme Court.
Dec 7, 1893.
34 P. 1095
1893 Ida. LEXIS 33
R. P. Quarles, for Appellant., Texas Angel, for Respondent.
Huston, Morgan, Sullivan.
Published
SULLIVAN, J.

This is an attempted appeal from the judgment. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record fails to show that the notice of appeal has been served. Section 4808 of the Eevised Statutes of Idaho, provides as follows: “An appeal is taken by filing with the clerk of the court in which the judgment or order appealed from is entered, a notice stating the appeal from the same, or some specific part thereof, and serving a similar notice on the adverse party or his attorney.” This section is mandatory, and requires appellant to file with the proper clerk, and to serve on the adverse party ox his attorney, the notice of appeal. The appeal is taken by complying with the requirements of said section, and without compliance therewith an appeal cannot be taken. The jurisdiction depends upon a compliance with the provisions of said section, and the record on appeal must affirmatively show that the notice of appeal was served upon the adverse party or his attorney, to give this court jurisdiction to determine the ease upon its merits. In Tootle v. French, ante, p. 1, 25 Pac. 1091, this court held that the record must affirmatively show that the notice of appeal had been filed with the clerk, and served on the adverse party or his attorney, within the time required by the statute. (See, also, Hayne on New Trial and Appeal, sec. 210; Ellis v. Bennett (Cal.), 3 Pac.[*721] 801; Brown v. Green, 65 Cal. 221, 3 Pac. 811; Franklin v. Reiner, 8 Cal. 340; Beets v. Chart, 79 Cal. 185, 21 Pac. 730; Pateman v. Tyrrel, 59 Cal. 320.) The judgment of the court below is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, with costs in favor •of the respondent.

Huston, C. J., and Morgan, J., concur.