green
Positive treatment
9.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Simon v. Bostic
See Jackson v. United States, 896 F.2d 1370 (9th Cir. 7 1/1990). 8 The Court explained these (and additional) reasons for dismissal at the hearing. 9 || Plaintiff's above-captioned lawsuits are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Simon v. Washington
See Jackson v. United States, 896 F.2d 1370 (9th Cir. 7 1/1990). 8 The Court explained these (and additional) reasons for dismissal at the hearing. 9 || Plaintiff's above-captioned lawsuits are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Simon v. Cumba
See Jackson v. United States, 896 F.2d 1370 (9th Cir. 7 1/1990). 8 The Court explained these (and additional) reasons for dismissal at the hearing. 9 || Plaintiff's above-captioned lawsuits are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Harris
v.
Harris
36-3_3.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 2, 1990.
Cited by 4 opinions | Unpublished
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Howard James HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
1
Nos. 88-1479, 88-1487.
2
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 11, 1989.
Decided March 2, 1990.
3
Memorandum Withdrawn March 28, 1990.
4
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION.