Adams v. State, 518 S.W.3d 282 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Adams v. State, 518 S.W.3d 282 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louis James ADAMS, Movant/Appellant
v.
STATE of Missouri
No. ED 104861.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
May 16, 2017.
518 S.W.3d 282
2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 425
2017 WL 2118545
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101., ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Josh Hawley, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Hoff, III, Lisa.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Louis J. Adams (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment” (“Judgment”) denying Movant’s “Amended Motion to Correct Judgment or Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing,” which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurispru[*283] dential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).