Theodore v. Rastok v. Coca Cola Bottling, 916 F.2d 713 (6th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Theodore v. Rastok v. Coca Cola Bottling, 916 F.2d 713 (6th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United Food & Commercial Workers v. Kroger Co. (ca6, 2022-10-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United Food & Commercial Workers v. Kroger Co.
6th Cir. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence medium
After we accept the answer’s well-pleaded allegations as true and construe the pleadings and exhibits in a light most favorable to the defendant, “the motion may be granted only if the [plaintiff] is nevertheless clearly entitled to judgment.” S. Ohio Bank v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 479 F.2d 478, 480 (6th Cir. 1973); see also Murray v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 916 F.2d 713, at *2 (6th Cir. 1990) (Table) (citing Nat’l Metro.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Arvil Hall v. Jon Shipley, Don Boles, Phillip Nall, and Sgt. Jack Mansfield
6th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Reneer v. Wall, 916 F.2d 713 (6th Cir.1990) (Westlaw) (“that statement [made in Fran cis] remains true today”); 2 W.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Theodore
v.
Rastok v. Coca Cola Bottling
89-4008.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 22, 1990.
916 F.2d 713
Unpublished

916 F.2d 713

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Theodore v. RASTOK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COCA COLA BOTTLING, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-4008.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1990.

Before KEITH and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and ZATKOFF, District Judge.[*]

PER CURIAM:

1

Theodore V. and Sally T. Rastock appeal from the district court's September 29, 1989, order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Coca-Cola Bottle Company of Ohio, Donald M. Bischoff, and Kelly E. Wilson, dismissing Counts I and IV with prejudice and dismissing Counts II and III without prejudice.

2

Having carefully considered the record and the arguments presented in the briefs and orally, we find no error warranting reversal. We, therefore, AFFIRM the order of the Honorable Ann Aldrich, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, for the reasons set forth in her Memorandum Opinion and Order.

*

The Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation