People v. Fugita, 192 P.2d 948 (Cal. 1948). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Fugita, 192 P.2d 948 (Cal. 1948). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: In Re Stallings (calctapp, 1970-03-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Stallings
Cal. Ct. App. · 1970 · confidence medium
(In re Davis, 31 Cal.2d 872, 875 [ 236 P.2d 579 ]; In re Levi, 39 Cal.2d 41 , 44-47 [ 244 P.2d 403 ].) However, there is no legal requirement that a defendant be returned to the trial court for arraignment for judgment after an affirmance upon appeal.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THE PEOPLE
v.
SOGATARO FUGITA
S. F. No. 17589.
California Supreme Court.
May 18, 1948.
192 P.2d 948
1948 Cal. LEXIS 378
Published
THE COURT.

This action was brought to declare an escheat of real property held by aliens ineligible for American citizenship. Subsequent to the noticing of the appeal, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Oyama v. State of California, 332 U.S. 633 [68 S.Ct. 269, 92 L.Ed.-], and the parties hereto, conceding that the Oyama decision is controlling of the issues presented here, have filed a stipulation for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment is therefore reversed, each side to bear its own costs on appeal, and remittitur to issue forthwith.