Askin v. City of New York, 906 N.E.2d 1058 (N.Y. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Askin v. City of New York, 906 N.E.2d 1058 (N.Y. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Ray v. Stockton (nyappdiv, 2018-06-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ray v. Stockton
N.Y. App. Div. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
In light of the insufficiency of the evidence with respect to the issues of sole purpose and wrongful means, "any possible error resulting from the instruction given was rendered harmless" ( Mossidus v Hartley , 106 AD2d 805, 806 [3d Dept 1984]; see Askin v City of New York , 56 AD3d 394 , 395 [1st Dept 2008], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 769 [2009]; see also Browne v Prime Contr.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Judith Askin
v.
City of New York, and New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 26, 2009.
906 N.E.2d 1058
2009 N.Y. LEXIS 165
Published

[*770] Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.