green
Positive treatment
Issue: equitable estoppel doctrineNY ↗
Issue: genetic marker testNY ↗
2.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Stephen N. v. Amanda O.
The party asserting equitable estoppel — William P. — must first make a prima facie showing that "he and the child had a parent-child relationship, so as to shift the burden to petitioner to prove that it was nonetheless in the child's best interests to order genetic marker testing" ( Matter of Beth R. v. Ronald S. , 149 AD3d 1216, 1218 [2017] [internal citations omitted]; see Matter of Patrick A. v Rochelle B. , 135 AD3d 1025, 1026 [2016], lv dismissed 27 NY3d 957 [2016]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nomura Asset Capital Corporation
v.
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, Appellant-Respondent
v.
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, Appellant-Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 31, 2016.
49 N.E.3d 1213
2016 N.Y. LEXIS 725
Difiore, Garcia.
Published
Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judge Garcia taking no part.