New York State Thruway Auth. v. Ashley Motor Court, Inc., 178 N.E.2d 232 (N.Y. 1961). · Go Syfert
Search
New York State Thruway Auth. v. Ashley Motor Court, Inc., 178 N.E.2d 232 (N.Y. 1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. PubLic Service Commission (ny, 1988-02-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. PubLic Service Commission
NY · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
The State may, in the reasonable exercise of its police power, condition or restrict private businesses or prohibit the operation of some businesses entirely to further its policies (Nebbia v New York, 291 US 502, 527-528 ; see also, New York State Thruway Auth. v Ashley Motor Ct., 10 NY2d 151 , remittitur amended 10 NY2d 814 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
New York State Thruway Authority
v.
Ashley Motor Court, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 5, 1961.
178 N.E.2d 232
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, in addition to the constitutional questions treated in the opinion, there was presented and necessarily passed upon the further question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether section 361-a of the Public Authorities Law 1 ‘ infringed upon the constitutional guarantees”, under the First Amendment, “of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.” The Court of Appeals held there was no such infringement. [See 10 N Y 2d 151.]