People v. Cohen, 219 N.E.2d 427 (NY 1966). · Go Syfert
People v. Cohen, 219 N.E.2d 427 (NY 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Carl I. Cohen
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 7, 1966.
219 N.E.2d 427
Eugene Gold for appellant., Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney {William'I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.
Accordingly, Act, Adhere, Beegan, Bueke, Communications, Contravention, Desmond, Dinan, Excluded, Expressed, From, Fuld, Interception, Keating, Obtained, Scileppi, Should, Voorhis, Vote.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Van VooRhis, Bueke, Scileppi, Beegan and Keating. Judge Fuld dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge Desmond concurs: I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan (11 N Y 2d 350, 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.