Morales v. Rothke, 223 N.E.2d 50 (N.Y. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Morales v. Rothke, 223 N.E.2d 50 (N.Y. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Felipe Morales
v.
Helmut Rothke
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 1, 1966.
223 N.E.2d 50
1966 N.Y. LEXIS 951
Norman Bard for appellants., Arthur N. Seiff and William P. Kewnedy for Helmut and Anna Rothke, respondents., William J. Began for Ralph Saralequi, respondent.
Bergan, Burke, Desmond, Fact, Fuld, Jury, Keating, Morales, Negligence, Plaintiffs, Question, Salisbury, Scileppi, Trial, Voorhis, Vote.
Published

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

[*915] Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Yak Voorhis and Scileppi. Judges Burke, Bergan and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial as to plaintiffs, Felipe Morales and Louis M. Morales, on the ground that their contributory negligence was a question of fact for the jury (see Vanyo v. Salisbury, 16 N Y 2d 969).