People v. Polhill, 257 N.E.2d 294 (N.Y. 1970). · Go Syfert
People v. Polhill, 257 N.E.2d 294 (N.Y. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Slutsky v. Blooming Grove Inn, Inc. (nyappdiv, 1989-06-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Slutsky v. Blooming Grove Inn, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
If a notice of pendency is vacated or if its initial three-year life is not timely extended (see, CPLR 6513, 6514), successive notices may not be filed for the purposes of CPLR article 65 and the plaintiff loses the special privilege afforded by that article (see, Holiday Investors Corp. v Breger & Co., 112 AD2d 979 ; see also, Robbins v Goldstein, 32 AD2d 1047 , appeal dismissed 26 NY2d 749 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Edward Polhill
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 22, 1970.
257 N.E.2d 294
1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1594
Published

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendant under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. Defendant argued that he had been deprived of his fundamental constitutional rights to a fair trial and to due process of law because the mental infirmity, paranoid schizophrenia, of the prosecution’s principal witness was or should have been known to the prosecution and was not called to the attention of the jury. The Court of Appeals considered this contention and held that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 25 N Y 2d 1002.]