green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
PRIMETIME v. City of Albuquerque
(2×)
Rental value of the land would be an objective or market estimate of the land's value for the purpose of generating profits; so an award of rental value already takes into account the profitability of the land, and the plaintiff must not be allowed to recover both. 1 Dobbs, supra, § 5.12(2), at 832-33 (footnotes omitted); see Keystone Assocs. v. State, 55 A.D.2d 85 , 389 N.Y.S.2d 895, 899 (App.Div.1976) (Greenblott, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) ("While potential profits themselves would be an inappropriate measure of damages, projected return [on the property] could be taken…
discussed
Cited "see"
Primetime Hospitality, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque
(2×)
Rental value of the land would be an objective or market estimate of the land’s value for the purpose of generating profits; so an award of rental value already takes into account the profitability of the land, and the plaintiff must not be allowed to recover both. 1 Dobbs, supra, § 5.12(2), at 832-33 (footnotes omitted); see Keystone Assocs. v. State, 55 A.D.2d 85 , 389 N.Y.S.2d 895, 899 (App.Div.1976) (Greenblott, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“While potential profits themselves would be an inappropriate measure of damages, projected return [on the property] could be t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Primetime Hospitality, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque
(2×)
In a dissent to the appellate court’s decision that was later adopted as controlling law, Justice Greenblott argued that “[w]hile potential profits themselves would be an inappropriate measure of damages, projected return on the basis of development plans suitable to the property could be taken into account by experts, together with the other figures cited, in determining fair rental value.” Keystone Assocs. v. State, 55 A.D.2d 85 , 389 N.Y.S.2d 895, 899 (1976) (Greenblott, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); see also Keystone Assocs. v. State, 45 N.Y.2d 894 , 411 N.Y.S.2d 8 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Keystone Associates
v.
State of New York
v.
State of New York
Claim No. 49592.
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 24, 1978.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Carl Golden, Martin Blackman and Alan G. Weiler for appellant., Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Vernon Stuart and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to the Court of Claims for a new trial on the issue of damages on the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by Mr. Justice Louis M. Greenblott at the Appellate Division (55 AD2d, at pp 89-91).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.