Trepuk v. Frank, 437 N.E.2d 278 (N.Y. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Trepuk v. Frank, 437 N.E.2d 278 (N.Y. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Gurbanova v. City of Ithaca, 2025 NY Slip Op 00252 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2025)
How cited ↗
Cited for
56 N.Y.2d at 780 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Gurbanova v. City of Ithaca, 2025 NY Slip Op 00252 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2025).
    To sustain their prima facie burden on a motion for summary judgment dismissing a complaint, defendants are obligated to address the specific allegations in the complaint ( see Trepuk v Frank , 56 NY2d 779, 780 [1982]; Wiater v Lewis , 197…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Meryl F. Trepuk
v.
Norman D. Frank, Individually and as of Joseph Steinhardt
New York Court of Appeals.
May 18, 1982.
437 N.E.2d 278
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3417
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Edward P. Ryan for appellants., Armand J. Rosenberg for respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Harold Birns at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 578, 579).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.