Suburban Pontiac, Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 448 N.E.2d 789 (N.Y. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Suburban Pontiac, Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 448 N.E.2d 789 (N.Y. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Suburban Pontiac, Inc.
v.
General Motors Corp.
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 22, 1983.
448 N.E.2d 789
1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2942
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Michael J. Ricigliano, John F. Principe and David J. Sutton for appellants., Guy Miller Struve, Mary Anne Wirth, D. Scott Wise and Peter D. Kolbrener for respondents.
Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. The factual determinations of the Appellate Division more nearly conform to the weight of the evidence, and there was no error of law in its declaration that General Motors had validly exercised its right to terminate the dealership agreement or in its decision that the complaint should otherwise be dismissed.

[*990] Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.