City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. Lane Bryant Queens, Inc., 451 N.E.2d 501 (N.Y. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. Lane Bryant Queens, Inc., 451 N.E.2d 501 (N.Y. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Henry & Baltic Associates v. K & Q Food Corp. (nyappterm, 2005-03-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Henry & Baltic Associates v. K & Q Food Corp.
N.Y. App. Term. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
Inasmuch as a valid predicate notice is a condition precedent to a summary holdover proceeding (see Chinatown Apts. v Chu Cho Lam, 51 NY2d 786 [1980]) and predicate notices are not amendable (id.; see City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v Lane Bryant Queens, 90 AD2d 976 [1982], affd 59 NY2d 825 [1983]), the petition must be dismissed (see City of New York v Bullock, 159 Misc 2d 716 [1993], affd 164 Misc 2d 1052 [1995]).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Authentic Hansom Cabs, Ltd. v. Nisselson (In re Fayolle)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. Lane Bryant Queens, Inc., 90 A.D.2d 976 , 456 N.Y.S.2d 568 (4th Dep’t 1982), aff'd 59 N.Y.2d 825 , 464 N.Y.S.2d 754 , 451 N.E.2d 501 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency
v.
Lane Bryant Queens, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 7, 1983.
451 N.E.2d 501
1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3155
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, James L. Magavern and Susan C. Goldberg for appellant., David C. Diefendorf for respondent.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (90 AD2d 976).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.