Bermont Operating Corp. v. City of New York, 458 N.E.2d 1252 (N.Y. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Bermont Operating Corp. v. City of New York, 458 N.E.2d 1252 (N.Y. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bermont Operating Corp.
v.
City of New York
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 23, 1983.
458 N.E.2d 1252
1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3552
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Robert S. Powers for appellant., Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Miriam Skolnik of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division properly found that the parties had manifested their assent to a renewal lease with a term commencing on March 3, 1979. Plaintiff, having executed and returned four copies of a Board of Estimate resolution which expressly recited that commencement date and which had been transmitted with a letter advising that signing the resolution would constitute the lease renewal[*904] agreement, expressed its intent by its actions. When this execution of the agreement is viewed in combination with plaintiff’s acceptance of the reduced rental amount provided under the renewal lease, it becomes apparent that there was mutual assent to a March 3, 1979 commencement provision. Plaintiff’s letter of September 17, 1979 expressing its understanding of the commencement time could thus be disregarded.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.