Blanca Rosa Echeverria-Hernandez v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 946 F.2d 1481 (9th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Blanca Rosa Echeverria-Hernandez v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 946 F.2d 1481 (9th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. Islam Repub Iran (cadc, 2002-01-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. Islam Repub Iran
D.C. Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Echeverria-Hernandez v. INS, 923 F.2d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1991) (applying de novo review to question of international law), vacated on other grounds by 946 F.2d 1481 (9th Cir. 1991); see also Fed.
cited Cited "see" McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. Islam Repub Iran
D.C. Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Echeverria-Hernandez v. INS, 923 F.2d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1991) (applying de novo review to question of international law), vacated on other grounds by 946 F.2d 1481 (9th Cir. 1991); see also Fed.
discussed Cited "see" McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Iran
D.C. Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Echeverria-Hernandez v. INS, 923 F.2d 688, 692 (9th Cir.1991) (applying de novo review to question of international law), vacated on other grounds by 946 F.2d 1481 (9th Cir.1991); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 44.1 (“[A]n issue concerning the law of a foreign country ... shall be treated as a question of law.”).
discussed Cited "see" Raynaud Castillo-Bendana v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
Arriaga-Barrientos v. INS, 925 F.2d 1177, 1180 (9th Cir.1991); Ramirez-Rivas v. INS, 899 F.2d 864, 867 (9th Cir.1990), vacated on other grounds, 112 S.Ct. 858 (1992); see Echeverria-Hernandez v. INS, 923 F.2d 688, 691 (9th Cir.) (isolated acts of violence insufficient to establish well-founded fear), vacated on other grounds en banc, 946 F.2d 1481 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Yonathan Kahssai v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Estradas-Posadas v. INS, 924 F.2d 916, 918-20 (9th Cir.1991); see also Echeverria-Hernandez v. INS, 923 F.2d 688, 691 , vacated on other grounds, 946 F.2d 1481 (9th Cir.1991); cf. Ramirez Rivas v. INS, 899 F.2d 864, 868-72 (9th Cir.1990), vacated on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 858 , 116 L.Ed.2d 766 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blanca Rosa ECHEVERRIA-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner,
v.
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
89-70236.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 5, 1991.
946 F.2d 1481
91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8862
1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26567
Linton Joaquin, Central American Refugee Center, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner., Mary A. Sedgwick, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Wallace, Browning, Fletcher, Canby, Reinhardt, Hall, Brunetti, Kozinski, Thompson, Fernandez, Nelson.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
Reporter's Syllabus editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

Linton Joaquin, Central American Refugee Center, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Mary A. Sedgwick, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, FLETCHER, CANBY, REINHARDT, HALL, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, THOMPSON, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Lead Opinion

The Opinion filed in this case on January 14, 1991, 923 F.2d 688 (9th Cir.1991), is vacated. As an alternative to the stay requested by the parties, within thirty days of the entry of this order the court will dismiss the petition for review without prejudice to reinstatement. Any objections to the dismissal without prejudice shall be filed within twenty-one days of the entry of this order. If no objection is filed, the petition will be dismissed without further notice.

To preserve the automatic stay under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(3), the mandate will be withheld until termination of any administrative proceedings affecting appellant Eeheverria-Hernandez commenced pursuant to the settlement agreement in American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh, 760 F.Supp. 796 (N.D.Cal.1991), or the Immigration Act of 1990 (Pub.L. No. 101-649), or until further order of this court. The parties are instructed promptly to advise the court of any change in circumstances that might moot the petition for review or otherwise make it appropriate to issue the mandate.

Dissent

WALLACE, Chief Judge, with whom Circuit Judges CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, BRUNETTI, DAVID R. THOMPSON, and FERNANDEZ join,

dissenting:

Our court has adopted an administrative policy that, once cases such as this are in the jurisdiction of a panel, the panel has the discretion to stay or decide the appeal and file a disposition. I assume the same policy applies to an en banc court.

The panel, for good reasons, decided not to stay. The majority of the en banc court believes we should. I disagree and would not stay the appeal or dismiss the petition.