Lott & Co. v. Strickland, 30 S.E. 872 (Ga. 1898). · Go Syfert
Search
Lott & Co. v. Strickland, 30 S.E. 872 (Ga. 1898). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bishop v. Georgia National Bank (gactapp, 1913-07-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bishop v. Georgia National Bank
Ga. Ct. App. · 1913 · signal: see · confidence high
See, in this connection, Buck v. Bank, 104 Ga. 660 ( 30 S. E. 872 ); Whitley v. Hudson, 114 Ga. 669 ( 40 S. E. 838 ); Trammell v. Swift, 121 Ga. 780 ( 49 S. E. 739 ); Shank v. Washington Exchange Bank, 124 Ga. 509 ( 52 S. E. 621 ); Camp v. Simmons, 62 Ga. 73 ; Cauthen v. Central Georgia Bank, 69 Ga. 733 ; Underwood v. Bass, 1 Ga. App. 623 ( 57 S. E. 953 ). 2. ' In the 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, and 6th grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial Bishop complains of the admission of certain testimony over the objection that it was immaterial and wholly irrelevant to the issue, to wit, wh…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Seay's Home Furnishings, Inc. v. Dozier Home Builders, Inc.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Buck v. Bank of Georgia, 104 Ga. 660 ( 30 SE 872 ).
cited Cited "see, e.g." McWhorter v. Swilley
Ga. Ct. App. · 1918 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Buck v. Bank of the State of Georgia, 104 Ga. 660 ( 30 S. E. 872 ); Bishop v. Georgia National Bank, 13 Ga. App. 38 (2) ( 78 S. E. 947 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lott & Company
v.
Strickland
Supreme Court of Georgia.
May 27, 1898.
30 S.E. 872
1898 Ga. LEXIS 611
'John O. McDonald, for plaintiffs in error.
Lewis.
Published
Lewis, J.

There was no error of law committed, in the light of the explanation given by the trial judge; and there being some evidence-to sustain the finding against the defendants, we will not interfere-with the discretion of the court below in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.