Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy, 35 S.E. 632 (Ga. 1900). · Go Syfert
Search
Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy, 35 S.E. 632 (Ga. 1900). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gerace v. Bentley (visuper, 2015-05-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gerace v. Bentley
visuper · 2015 · confidence medium
Ct. App. 2010); Hudgins v. Hudgins, 182 Ga. 493 , 185 S.E. 870 (1936); Martin v. Armour Packing Co., 110 Ga. 569 , 35 S.E. 632, 633 (1900) (if the deposit is not made before the filing of the suit, the suit may be dismissed).
cited Cited "see" Hayles v. Southern Ry.
S.D. Ga. · 1928 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martin & Co. v. Armour Packing Co., 110 Ga. 569 , 35 S. E. 632 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Perry v. Perry
Ga. · 1939 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy, 111 Ga. 827 ( 35 S. E. 632 ); Ellis v. Almand, 115 Ga. 333 ( 41 S. E. 642 ); Georgia Northern Ry.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louisville Coffin Company
v.
Rhudy
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Apr 11, 1900.
35 S.E. 632
1900 Ga. LEXIS 769
Henry Walker, for plaintiff., George A. H. Harris & Son, for defendant.
Lumpkin.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Lumpkin, P. J.

1. A judgment overruling a demurrer to an answer, unless excepted to and reversed, concludes the plaintiff as to the legal sufficiency of theanswer; andif the samegoes to the wholeof the plaintiff’s demand and is duly supported by evidence, a complete defense is established.

2. Applying this rule to the evidence appearing in the record, the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.

3. No material error of law was committed by the court below, and the newly discovered evidence presents no cause for a neiy trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.