green
Positive treatment
Issue: investigation testGA ↗
Issue: grand jury challengeGA ↗
Issue: good ground challengeGA ↗
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1932 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1932
1979
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cobb v. State
See Powers v. State, 172 Ga. 1 (15) ( 157 SE 195 ); Downs v. State, 208 Ga. 619 (3), 622 ( 68 SE2d 568 ); Seymour v. State, 210 Ga. 571 (6) ( 81 SE2d 808 ); Wilson v. State, 215 Ga. 782 (2) ( 113 SE2d 447 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. State
See, in this connection, Powers v. State, 172 Ga. 1, 3 (15) ( 157 S. E. 195 ); Shafer v. State, 191 Ga. 722 (2) ( 13 S. E. 2d 798 ); Garner v. State, 6 Ga. App. 788 (4) ( 65 S. E. 842 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Withers
v.
Maddox Coffee Company
v.
Maddox Coffee Company
No. 7833.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Feb 23, 1931.
Thomas H. Goodwin and Hooper & Hooper, for plaintiffs in error., Troutman & Troutman and Bay Williams, contra.
Published
Per Curiam.
Under the pleadings and the evidence the verdict for the plaintiff was demanded. None of the grounds of the motion for new trial require a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.