Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co., 195 S.E. 156 (Ga. 1938). · Go Syfert
Search
Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co., 195 S.E. 156 (Ga. 1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Atkinson, solicitor-general
v.
Lam Amusement Co.
No. 12147.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jan 14, 1938.
195 S.E. 156
1938 Ga. LEXIS 423
W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, L. L. Meadors, and Moon & Ray, for plaintiffs., Wyatt & Morgan and Lovejoy & Mayer, for defendants.
Grice.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Grice, Justice.

This ease is controlled, by the ruling in Rose Theatre Inc. v. Lilly, 185 Ga. 53 (193 S. E. 866), wherein it was held that it was not error to overrule a demurrer to the petition brought by the solicitor-general, containing allegations very similar to those made in this petition, and which are substantially set forth in the accompanying statement of facts. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, L. L. Meadors, and Moon & Ray, for plaintiffs. Wyatt & Morgan and Lovejoy & Mayer, for defendants.