Murtha v. Preis, 952 F.2d 396 (1991). · Go Syfert
Murtha v. Preis, 952 F.2d 396 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ann M. Murtha
v.
Frederick G. Preis, D.D.S. C. Joe Cochran, Corporal Thomas P. Broumel, Chief of Police of the Bel Air Police Department Jane L. Podles, Admitted \Friend\" Frederick G. Preis
Dec 27, 1991.
Unpublished opinion
952 F.2d 396
1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 32748
1991 WL 274887
R

952 F.2d 396

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ann M. MURTHA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frederick G. PREIS, D.D.S.; C. Joe Cochran, Corporal;
Thomas P. Broumel, Chief of Police of the Bel Air Police
Department; Jane L. Podles, Admitted "Friend"; Frederick
G. Preis, Mrs. a/k/a Mary Louise Preis, Delegate; Attorney
General of the United States, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1223.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 5, 1991.
Decided Dec. 27, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. (CA-91-2924), Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.

Ann M. Murtha, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

[*~396–397]1

Ann M. Murtha appeals from the district court's order dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Murtha v. Preis, No. CA-91-2924 (D.Md. Oct. 17, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.