Woodward Lumber Co. v. Watson, Vansant & Co., 68 S.E. 622 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910). · Go Syfert
Woodward Lumber Co. v. Watson, Vansant & Co., 68 S.E. 622 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woodward Lumber Co.
v.
Watson, Vansant & Co.
2548.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 25, 1910.
Published opinion
68 S.E. 622
1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 61
E. V. Carter, for plaintiff in error., John A. Boykin, TF. II. Underwood, contra..
Hill.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Hill, C. J.

1. An answer in behalf of a corporation by its bookkeeper who answers positively to the facts therein stated is sufficient, and the striking of such an answer because not made and verified by the corporation was erroneous. Walker v. Swift Fertilizer Works, 3 Ga. App. 283 (59 S. E. 850).

2. A garnishee in his answer admitting indebtedness may set up that the amount of indebtedness admitted is exempt from process of garnishment, because it is wages due to a daily laborer; and where the exemption is so set up, the court can not, in the absence of any traverse, render judgment against the garnishee. Walker v. Swift Fertilizer Co., supra; Pioneer Co-operative Co. v. Eagle & Phoenix Mfg. Co., 67 Ga. 38; Emmons v. Southern Bell Tel. Co., 80 Ga. 760 (7 S. E. 232).

Judgment reversed.