Davis v. Skinner, 85 S.E. 970 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915). · Go Syfert
Search
Davis v. Skinner, 85 S.E. 970 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Ham (gactapp, 1948-12-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Ham
Ga. Ct. App. · 1948 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Davis v. Skinner, 16 Ga. App. 693 ( 85 S. E. 970 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
Skinner
6203.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Aug 6, 1915.
85 S.E. 970
1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 200
H. Jeff Davis, for plaintiff., Brinson & Hatcher, for defendant.
Russell.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Russell, C. J.

There was some evidence upon which the court, sitting both as judge and jury, was authorized to find for the defendant, and in such a ease the Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction to disturb the finding, even,though the evidence be weak and unsatisfactory, when the motion for a new trial contains no other assignment of error than the usual general grounds. Judgment affirmed.