Beck v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 95 S.E. 1002 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918). · Go Syfert
Search
Beck v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 95 S.E. 1002 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beck
v.
Armour Fertilizer Works
9402.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
May 17, 1918.
95 S.E. 1002
1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 371
E. II. Bech, W-. E. Mann, for plaintiff in error., King & Starr, contra.
Bloodworth, Broyles, Harwell.
Published
Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. The evidence authorized the verdict.’ Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur. (