Cuba v. State, 102 S.E. 830 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). · Go Syfert
Cuba v. State, 102 S.E. 830 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Cuba
v.
State
11237.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 14, 1920.
102 S.E. 830
1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 706
H. A. Allen, for plaintiff in error., John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, contra.
Bloodworth.
Published
Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial in which it was contended ¡that the defendant’s right of cross-examination was unduly restricted by the court.

2. The court did not err in charging the jury- on the law as to shooting at another.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.