Bell v. State, 102 S.E. 845 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). · Go Syfert
Bell v. State, 102 S.E. 845 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Bell
v.
State
11284.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Apr 14, 1920.
Published opinion
102 S.E. 845
1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 713
M. C. Edwards, for plaintiff in error., B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.
Bloodworth.
Published
Bloodworth, J.

The evidence for the State shows an unprovoked attack with a deadly weapon upon the person assaulted. Even under the statement of the defendant a verdict of guilty was demanded. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for new trial which would demand that a verdict so clearly correct should he set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke J., concur. M. C. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.