Crider v. Matthews, 123 S.E. 918 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924). · Go Syfert
Search
Crider v. Matthews, 123 S.E. 918 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crider
v.
Matthews
15590.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 15, 1924.
Published opinion
123 S.E. 918
1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 497
J. V. Poole, B. H. Sullivan, for plaintiff in error., Etheridge, Sams & Etheridge, contra.
Broyles.
Published
Broyles, C. J.

Under all the particular facts of the case as disclosed by the record, the verdict was authorized by the evidence; and there is no substantial merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. The overruling of the motion was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.