Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 125 S.E. 523 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924). · Go Syfert
Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 125 S.E. 523 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Ost
v.
Merchants & Farmers Bank
15086.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 13, 1924.
125 S.E. 523
1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 744
Gibbs & Turner, J. H. Quarterman, Parker & Parker, for plaintiff., Thomas & Walker, for defendants.
Bell, Jenldns, Stephens.
Published
Bell, J.

In this action upon a promissory note a verdict was found for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a motion for a new tidal, which the court granted, and the plaintiff excepted. Held: 'Under the ruling of the Supremo Court in answer to a question certified, the evidence demanded a finding in favor of the plaintiff, and the trial court erred in granting a new trial. The material facts as disclosed by the evidence are embraced in the certified question. See Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 159 Ga. 200 (124 S. E. 883).

Judgment reversed.

Jenldns, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.