Studstill v. State, 170 S.E. 91 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933). · Go Syfert
Search
Studstill v. State, 170 S.E. 91 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bishop v. State (gactapp, 1955-07-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Bishop v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1955 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Austin v. State, 47 Ga. App. 191 ( 170 S. E. 86 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Studstill
v.
State
23137.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 7, 1933.
170 S.E. 91
1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 337
W. A. Wooten, L. G. Harrell, J. H. Milner, for plaintiff in error., M. H. Boyer, solicitor-general, contra.
Guerry.
Published
Guerry, J.

Tlie bill of exceptions in tbis case was unsigned when tendered to the trial judge on March 1st, which was the last day on which it could be tendered. The judge certifies that he did not discover that it was unsigned until March 3d, at which time he allowed counsel to sign it. Held, under the authority of O’Connell v. Friedman, 117 Ga. 948 (43 S. E. 1001), and Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co., 173 Ga. 856 (162 S. E. 134), and eit., that no legal bill of exceptions was tendered.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.