City of Rome v. Holcomb, 186 S.E. 711 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936). · Go Syfert
Search
City of Rome v. Holcomb, 186 S.E. 711 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bethune v. Leake (gactapp, 1985-11-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1936 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1936 1981 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bethune v. Leake
Ga. Ct. App. · 1985 · confidence medium
The theory is applicable to a landowner who maintains a dangerous nuisance “closely adjacent to a public street, sidewalk, or highway, or a much traveled and commonly used private way, or land dedicated to the use of the general public such as a recreation park. . . . [Cits.]” (Emphasis supplied.) Greenfield v. Watson, 54 Ga. App. 9, 12 ( 187 SE 183 ) (1936).
cited Cited as authority (rule) McMahen v. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1942 · confidence medium
Co. v. Autry, 36 Ga. App. 552 ( 137 S. E. 414 ).” Greenfield v. Watson, 54 Ga. App. 9, 10 ( 187 S. E. 183 ).
cited Cited "see" Williams v. Southern Railway Co.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bach v. Bragg Bros. & Blackwell, 53 Ga. App. 574, 577 ( 186 S. E. 711 ); McDowall Transport, Inc. v. Gault, 80 Ga. App. 445, 447 ( 56 S. E. 2d 161 ).
cited Cited "see" Mathis v. Nelson
Ga. Ct. App. · 1949 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bach v Bragg Bros. & Blackwell Inc., 53 Ga. App. 574 ( 186 S. E. 711 ).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Barbara R. Gross v. Southern Railway Company, Nancy Ruth Canipelli v. Southern Railway Company
5th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bach v. Bragg Brothers, 53 Ga.App. 574 , 186 S.E. 711 (1936); Central of Georgia Ry.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Rome
v.
Holcomb
25425.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jun 9, 1936.
186 S.E. 711
1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 444
W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff in error. Maddox & Griffin, contra.
Sutton.
Published
Sutton, J.

This is a companion case to that of City of Rome v. Brown, ante, 6, and is controlled by the opinion in that case.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.