People v. Hall, 5 A.D.3d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004). · Go Syfert
People v. Hall, 5 A.D.3d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Dean (nyappdiv, 2012-12-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Dean
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
Thus, we modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed on count three, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing on count three and for the court to correct the discrepancy between the certificate of conviction and the sentencing minutes regarding that count (see People v Hall, 5 AD3d 1011, 1011-1012 [2004]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Dean
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
Thus, we modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed on count three, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing on count three and for the court to correct the discrepancy between the certificate of conviction and the sentencing minutes regarding that count (see People v Hall, 5 AD3d 1011, 1011-1012 [2004]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Lawlor
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Defendant’s contentions with respect to the plea proceeding underlying the original judgment are not properly before us (see People v Van Every, 26 AD3d 777 [2006]; see also People v Hall, 5 AD3d 1011 [2004]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Ronald Hall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 19, 2004.
5 A.D.3d 1011
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Timothy J. Drury, J.), rendered December 14, 2001. The judgment revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for resentencing.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment sentencing him upon his admission that he violated the terms and conditions of his sentence of probation. Defendant’s contention that the original sentence of six months of imprisonment and five years of probation violated Penal Law § 60.05 (4) is not properly before us because, as defendant concedes, he did not appeal from the original judgment (see People v Brown, 307 AD2d 759 [2003]; People v Dabbs, 178 AD2d 848 [1991], lv denied 79 NY2d 946 [1992]). Although not raised by defendant, we note that there is a discrepancy between the certificate of conviction and the sentencing minutes. The certificate of conviction provides that a term of imprisonment of 41/2 to 131/2 years was imposed, which is a legal sentence, but the sentencing[*1012] minutes establish that County Court imposed a term of imprisonment of 41/2 to 121/2 years, which is not a legal sentence. We therefore modify the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing (see People v Freeney, 291 AD2d 913 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 637 [2002]; see also People v Schenk, 294 AD2d 914, 915 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 702 [2002]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.